Selena Buckman v. Norwest Financial of Mississippi, Inc.;

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 4, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 03-60969
SELENA BUCKMAN; GLENN BUCKMAN; COLLEEN JOHNSON; FREDERICK SMITH;
BARBARA SMITH; DAWN GEESLIN; CHARLENE BANKS; ANNIE BURNS; ROY
ROBINSON; ROSIE TURNER
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
NORWEST FINANCIAL OF MISSISSIPPI, INC.; et al
Defendants
WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL OF MISSISSIPPI INC.; CENTURION LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Mississippi, Jackson Division
(99-CV-181-BR)
Before REAVLEY, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Defendants-Appellants bring this appeal of a district court’s
order remanding this case to the state court from which it was

-- 1 of 2 --

2
removed. Alternatively, Defendants-Appellants petition this court
for a writ of mandamus to correct what they contend is an erroneous
remand order. “An order remanding a case to the State court from
which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.”
See 28 U.S.C. 1447(d); In re Excel Corp., 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS
12792 (5th Cir. 1997). Therefore, because the district court’s
remand order was based on a defect in the removal procedure, i.e.,
the untimeliness of removal, we lack jurisdiction to hear
Defendants-Appellants’ appeal or to grant the mandamus petition.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction and
the petition for mandamus is denied.

-- 2 of 2 --