The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-60884•Hearn, et al v. City of Jackson
03-60884Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitOct 14, 2004
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 14, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
In the
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
_______________
m 03-60884
_______________
DERIC HEARN; ALVALINE BAGGETT; CHARLES BANKS; JERRY BRISTER;
TOMMIE L. BROWN; JANE DOES 1-50; JOHN DOES; ET AL.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
VERSUS
CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI,
A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
m 3-99-CV-359-LN
_________________________
Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART,
Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The plaintiffs bring a title VII action for
disparate treatment and disparate impact.
Following a bench trial, the district court
issued a comprehensive opinion, entered
August 12, 2003, dismissing the complaint.
We have reviewed the briefs and applicable
portions of the record and have consulted the
relevant caselaw. Concluding that the district
court committed no reversible error, we af-
firm, essentially for the reasons given by the
district court in its impressive opinion.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has de-
termined that this opinion should not be published and
is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.