The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-60071•Jones v. Parker
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 3, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-60071
Summary Calendar
ERIC JONES,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
DIANE PARKER, Executrix of the Estate of Barry Parker, deceased,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 4:96-CV-1-P-A
--------------------
Before: BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Eric Jones, Mississippi prisoner # 45265, appeals from the
dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action on the basis that the
estate of Barry Parker has been closed and lacks assets from
which Jones may recover damages. The ability of a plaintiff to
recover under state law does not determine whether the
plaintiff’s action may proceed in federal court. Ransom v.
Brennan, 437 F.2d 513, 520 (5th Cir. 1971). Moreover, it is
-- 1 of 2 --
unclear whether Jones is precluded from reopening the estate and
recovering damages should he prevail on his substantive claims.
See Smith v. Estate of King, 501 So. 2d 1120, 1122-23 (Miss.
1987); Powell v. Buchanan, 147 So.2d 110, 111-12 (Miss. 1962).
VACATED AND REMANDED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.