United States v. Armendariz

03-50401Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitJul 14, 2004

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
July 14, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-50401
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RAMON ARMENDARIZ, also known as Sleepy,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-01-CR-1437-9-DB
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Ramon Armendariz on
direct appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Armendariz
filed a response in which he asserts that he did not waive his
right to the preparation of a presentence report (PSR) and that a
PSR would have indicated that his 180-month sentence constituted
an upward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines range. Our
independent review of the brief, Armendariz’s response, and the

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 03-50401
-2-
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.