The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-50323•Novelli v. Paschall, et al
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
March 8, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 03-50323
_____________________
GINGER RICHARDSON NOVELLI,
Plaintiff - Counter Defendant - Appellant- Cross-Appellee,
WILLIAM L. RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Cross-Appellee,
versus
JOSEPH PASCHALL, Etc.; ET AL.,
Defendants,
JOSEPH PASCHALL, doing business
as Paschall Skipper & Associates,
Individually and d/b/a Paschall Skipper &
Associates; PASCHALL SKIPPER & ASSOCIATES,
Defendants - Appellees,
PATRICK M. ARNOLD,
Defendant- Counter Plaintiff -Appellee - Cross-Appellant,
WATSON C. ARNOLD JR.,
Counter Plaintiff - Appellee - Cross-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. W-02-CV-47
_________________________________________________________________
Before JOLLY, DUHÉ, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 2 --
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
2
PER CURIAM:*
We have reviewed the record, studied the briefs and heard
arguments of counsel. We are now thoroughly convinced that the
judgment of the district court, granting summary judgment for the
defendants and dismissing the complaint, is free of error.
Consequently, its judgment is
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.