The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-50217•United States v. Phillips
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 22, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-50217
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM RAY PHILLIPS, II, also known as William Ray Phillips,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. W-02-CR-117-1
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent William Ray Phillips
on appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Phillips has received a copy of counsel’s motion but has not
filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 03-50217
-2-
to withdraw is granted, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is dismissed.
MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.