Williams v. Mir Mitchell and Co

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
May 30, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
In the
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
_______________
m 03-50176
Summary Calendar
_______________
CYNTHIA R. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
MIR, MITCHELL AND COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
m SA-01-CV-1097
_________________________
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and
CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Cynthia Williams appeals, pro se, a sum-
mary judgment denying her claim of retaliation
under title VII. Her brief on appeal fails to set
forth the facts and legal arguments, as the rules
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has
determined that this opinion should not be pub-
lished and is not precedent except under the limited
(continued...)
(...continued)
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
require. Nonetheless, we treat this as a
properly briefed case, and we affirm, essen-
tially for the reasons given by the magistrate
judge in his Memorandum and Recommen-
dation filed January 10, 2003, which was
accepted and approved by the district court in
entering summary judgment. The magistrate
judge correctly opined that there was no show-
ing of pretext in Williams’s termination, which
was for good cause.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is
DENIED. The summary judgment is
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --