The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-41132•Summary Calendar MICHELLE REED v. Lowe’s Home Centers Inc.;
03-41132Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitFeb 9, 2004
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
February 9, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-41132
Summary Calendar
MICHELLE REED,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LOWE’S HOME CENTERS INC.; ET AL.,
Defendants,
LOWE’S HOME CENTERS INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont
1:02-CV-475
Before JONES, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-appellant Michelle Reed (Reed) appeals from a
summary judgment dismissing her claims against Defendant-appellee,
Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., alleging employment discrimination and
-- 1 of 2 --
2
also claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress under
Texas state law. Our de novo review of the record leads to the
inescapable conclusion that Reed failed to establish a prima facie
case of discrimination and that her proof and allegations with
respect to her state law tort claim cannot survive summary
judgment. The judgment of the district court is affirmed
essentially for the reasons stated in the district court’s order
dated July 16, 2003.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.