The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-40626•Smith v. Lattimore Materials
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 8, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
In the
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
_______________
m 03-40626
Summary Calendar
_______________
KENNETH J. SMITH,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
LATTIMORE MATERIALS,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
m 4:02-CV-27
_________________________
Before SMITH, DEMOSS, and
STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Kenneth Smith, pro se, sued Lattimore
Materials for violation of the ADA. The mag-
istrate judge to whom the matter was referred
by consent granted summary judgment for
Lattimore. Smith appeals pro se.
There is no basis for recovery under the
ADA. The magistrate judge explained why in
a comprehensive and persuasive order dated
March 24, 2003, and entered on March 25,
2003.
The judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially
for the reasons given by the magistrate judge.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has de-
termined that this opinion should not be published
and is not precedent except under the limited cir-
cumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.