Full text
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 22, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-40323
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-02-CR-233-3
- - - - - - - - - -
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The lawyer appointed to represent Jose Luis Rodriguez on
appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the brief, Rodriguez’s response, and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities in this case, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
