United States v. Fuselier

03-30438Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitDec 8, 2003

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 5, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-30438
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID ANTHONY FUSELIER; BERRY LYNN HARRIS,
Defendants-Appellants.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:02-CR-20116-02
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Beverly L. Harris on direct
appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Harris has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.