United States v. Henderson

03-21076Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitAug 18, 2004

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-21076
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARNEZ LAMONT HENDERSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-03-CR-3-4
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Arnez Lamont Henderson has filed
a motion to withdraw and a supporting brief as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Henderson has received a
copy of counsel’s motion and brief and has filed a response. Our
independent review of the brief, Henderson’s response, and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 18, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.