United States v. Puga

03-20287Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitMay 6, 2004

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
May 6, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-20287
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
REFUJIO PUGA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-02-CR-378-3
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Refujio Puga on direct
appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Puga has not filed
a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 03-20287
-2-
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.