United States v. Cortez

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
February 18, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-20242
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ADRIAN SOLIS CORTEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-01-CR-180-2
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Adrian Solis Cortez has
moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cortez has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED.
The case is remanded for the purpose of correcting a
clerical error in the judgment. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 03-20242
-2-
The amended judgment should correct the term of supervised
release to conform to the four-year term of supervised release
imposed at sentencing.
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF
CLERICAL ERROR.

-- 2 of 2 --