United States v. Stribling

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
February 18, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-10627
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GENICE STRIBLING,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:99-CR-111-3-P
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Kevin Ross, the Federal Public Defender appointed to
represent Genice Stribling, has moved for leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Stribling has filed a response to Ross’s
motion. Our independent review of the record, Ross’s brief, and
Stribling’s response shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues
for appeal. Accordingly, Ross’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, the Federal Public Defender is excused from further

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 03-10627
-2-
responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --