United States v. Naslund

03-10076Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitJun 24, 2003

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
June 25, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-10076
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JIMMY LEE NASLUND,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:02-CR-69-1-C
--------------------
Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Jimmy
Lee Naslund on appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief
as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Naslund has filed no response. Our independent review of
counsel’s brief, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 03-10076
-2-
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.