Summary Calendar FU QIANG LIU v. John Ashcroft, Us Attorney General

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 7, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-61126
Summary Calendar
FU QIANG LIU
Petitioner
v.
JOHN ASHCROFT, US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Respondent
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A77 908 695
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Fu Qiang Liu, a Chinese national, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigrations Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision summarily
affirming the Immigration Judge’s order of removal and denial
of applications for asylum and withholding of deportation.
The Government moves to dismiss the appeal because the petition
for review was not timely filed.
An alien must file his petition for review “not later than
30 days after the date of the final order of removal.” 8 U.S.C.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-61126
-2-
§ 1252(b)(1). The 30-day filing deadline is jurisdictional.
Navarro-Miranda v. Ashcroft, 330 F.3d 672, 676 (5th Cir. 2003).
The 30-day deadline began to run in the instant case on
November 19, 2002, when the BIA issued its decision and wrote
a letter to Liu’s counsel notifying him of the decision.
The deadline expired on December 19, 2002. See Karimian-Kaklaki
v. I.N.S., 997 F.2d 108, 110-11 (5th Cir. 1993). Liu’s petition
for review, filed on December 20, 2002, was one day late.
Because the petition for review was untimely, this court lacks
jurisdiction. See Karimian-Kaklaki, 997 F.2d at 111-13; Guirguis
v. I.N.S., 993 F.2d 508, 509 (5th Cir. 1993); see also Navarro-
Miranda, 330 F.3d at 676. The Government’s motion to dismiss is
GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --