Mridha v. Ashcroft

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
June 23, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-60713
Summary Calendar
DULAL MRIDHA,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A73 569 373
--------------------
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Petitioner Dulal Mridha petitions this court for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) 1998 order denying his
asylum application and ordering deportation, and its 2002 order
denying Petitioner’s motion to reopen deportation proceedings.
The Respondent has moved for summary affirmance or, in the
alternative, to reset the briefing schedule to allow him to file a
brief.
As Mridha’s time for appealing the BIA’s denial of his asylum
application and order of deportation has expired, and as Mridha has

-- 1 of 2 --

2
failed to challenge the BIA’s determination that he failed to
present new material evidence in support of his motion to reopen,
we grant the Respondent’s motion for summary affirmance, deny his
alternative motion as unnecessary, and affirm the BIA’s rulings.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED; RULINGS AND ORDERS OF BIA AFFIRMED;
ALTERNATIVE MOTION DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --