02-60206, 02-60213 Case No. 02-60159 BANK ONE NA v. Tyrone Davis

02-60166Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitApr 14, 2003

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 14, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
Consolidated Cases Nos. 02-60159, 02-60166,
02-60204, 02-60206, 02-60213
_______________________
Case No. 02-60159
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
TYRONE DAVIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60166
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ROBERT BLACKMON,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60204
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LEADNER HACKETT,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60206

-- 1 of 3 --

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1 288 F.3d 181 (5th Cir. 2002).
2
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GWENDOLYN DIXON,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Case No. 02-60213
BANK ONE NA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ISSAC RICHARDSON, JR., also known as Issac Richardson,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
(3:01-CV-74-WS)
__________________________________________
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellants challenge the district court’s rulings
granting Bank One’s motions to compel arbitration and to stay the
Appellants’ pending state law claims. This case is
indistinguishable from those that we reviewed and ruled on in the
related cases of Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd1 and Bank One, N.A. v.

-- 2 of 3 --

2 No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished).
3 125 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Miss. 2001).
4 No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 2002) (order granting
petition to compel arbitration).
3
Lake.2 For essentially the same reasons that are set forth in our
opinion in Boyd and in the district court’s opinion in Bank One,
N.A. v. Coates,3 and Bank One, N.A. v. Taylor,4 the judgments of the
district court in these cases are, in all respects, AFFIRMED.

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.