The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-51004•United States v. Kelly
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 20, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-51004
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHARLES EARL KELLY, also known as Charles Kelly,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. W-02-CR-80-1
--------------------
Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Charles Earl Kelly has requested
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Kelly has not responded to the
motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record
discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 02-51004
-2-
R. 42.2. Counsel’s motion, incorporated in his brief, to allow
Kelly permission to proceed pro se is DENIED.
ANDERS MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR
PERMISSION FOR APPELLANT TO PROCEED PRO SE DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.