United States v. Stepan

02-50796Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitFeb 20, 2003

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-50796
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES RONNIE STEPAN, SR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. W-02-CR-30-1
--------------------
February 20, 2003
Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for James Ronnie Stepan, Sr., has
filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Stepan has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the record and
counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.