The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-50779•United States v. Hurlburt
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 24, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-50779
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GEORGE ROBERT HURLBURT,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-01-CV-221-DB
USDC No. EP-97-CR-602-3-DB
--------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
George Robert Hurlburt, federal prisoner # 81019-080, was
sentenced to 135 months of imprisonment for his conviction of
conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana.
Hurlburt appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 motion as time-barred.
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 02-50779
-2-
Hurlburt argues that his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion was timely
based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Hurlburt’s
argument is foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 305 F.3d 304,
310 (5th Cir. 2002), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Feb. 3,
2003)(No. 02-9606), which held that Apprendi “is not
retroactively applicable to initial petitions under § 2255.”
The district court did not err in denying Hurlburt’s motion.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.