The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-50288•Marroquin v. Johnson, et al
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-50288
Summary Calendar
JAIME FRAUSTO MARROQUIN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; WAYNE SCOTT, Executive
Director; ALLAN POLUNSKY, Chairman, Texas Board of Criminal
Justice, Austin, TEXAS; ALLEN HIGHTOWER, Executive Director,
Correctional Managed Health Care; LANNETTE LINTHICUM,
Director, Health Services Division; DALE A. MOHLER, Practice
Manager II, Hughes Unit; BILL WILLIAMS, Staff Nurse III,
Hughes Unit; DAVID COOPER, Licensed Vocational Nurse,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. W-01-CV-97
--------------------
July 2, 2002
Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant Jaime Frausto Marroquin, former Texas state
prisoner # 732430, contends that the appellees, officials and
employees of the Texas state prison system, have a constitutional
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 02-50288
-2-
obligation to provide the class comprised of prison inmates with
special work boots. IT IS ORDERED that Marroquin’s application
for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) is DENIED, because
the appeal lacks arguable merit and is therefore frivolous. See
Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31-33 (1992); Baugh v. Taylor,
117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Because the appeal is
frivolous, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Marroquin’s applications for the
appointment of counsel and for a continuance are DENIED.
MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.