United States v. Shutter

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
July 21, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-41500
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CLARK DALE SHUTTER,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:01-CR-184-1
--------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Clark Dale Shutter on
appeal has moved for leave to withdraw from representation of
Shutter, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Shutter has responded to counsel’s motion and has moved to
withdraw the Anders brief and for appointment of counsel. We
have reviewed counsel’s motion and Anders brief, Shutter’s
response, and the record and we find no nonfrivolous issues.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-41500
-2-
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein; Shutter’s motion to
withdraw the Anders brief and for appointment of counsel is
DENIED; and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --