United States v. Gomez-Cortez

02-41476Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitJun 24, 2003

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
June 25, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-41476
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GUADALUPE GOMEZ-CORTEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. M-00-CR-578-1
--------------------
Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender (FPD), appointed to represent
appellant Guadalupe Gomez-Cortez (Gomez), has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gomez has not filed a
response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue in this appeal. Accordingly, the motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, the FPD is excused from further

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-41476
-2-
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.