Kalimah, et al v. McKinney TX City of

02-41162Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitApr 16, 2003

Full text

*Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.
**Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 15, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 02-41162
JAMELL KALIMAH, Indivually and as administrator of the
Estate of Cathey Jo Howard-Kalimah Deceased and as next
friend of Syed A. Kalimah and Regyna Q. Howard, Minors; ANNIE
MARIE MCDONALD; RUDOLPH WINFRED MCDONALD,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
VERSUS
MCKINNEY, TEXAS, CITY OF; ET AL.,
Defendants,
JOYCE VANDERTUIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall
2:02-CV-22-TJW
Before DAVIS, HALL* and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:**

-- 1 of 2 --

2
For essentially the reasons stated by the district court in
its Order of August 2, 2002, we agree that the district court
correctly found that disputed issues of material fact are present
which required it to deny Officer Vandertuin’s motion for summary
judgment based on qualified immunity. We therefore have no
jurisdiction to review the district court’s order.
APPEAL DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.