United States v. Singh

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 10, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-41002
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GURMAIL SINGH,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:02-CR-30-ALL
--------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gurmail Singh has filed this interlocutory appeal from the
district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss his re-
indictment on several charges after the reversal of an earlier
conviction. Singh urges that the Double Jeopardy Clause
prohibits retrial both because his first conviction was reversed
for improper joinder and because of the unique circumstances
surrounding his case.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-41002
-2-
However, the prohibition against double jeopardy is not
implicated where an original conviction is reversed for reasons
other than the indication of innocence (such as insufficient
evidence) or prosecutorial misconduct intended to induce a
mistrial. United States v. Wharton, ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. Feb.
4, 2002, No. 01-30998), 2003 WL 231299 at *3; Shute v. State of
Tex., 117 F.3d 233, 238 (5th Cir. 1997). Because Singh has
offered no clear evidence that the original prosecutors behaved
improperly in order to induce an early termination to the trial,
there is no double jeopardy bar to his retrial.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --