United States v. McKinzie

02-40770Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitApr 25, 2003

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 24, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-40770
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRUCE MCKINZIE,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:01-CR-95-1
--------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Bruce McKinzie has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McKinzie has received a copy
of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-40770
-2-
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.