United States v. Adkism

02-40563Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitDec 13, 2002

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-40563
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL DEWAYNE ADKISM,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC Nos. 3:00-CV-55 & 3:97-CR-4-1
--------------------
December 12, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Michael DeWayne Adkism, federal prisoner # 06384-078,
appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255
motion. Adkism was sentenced to 235 months’ imprisonment
following his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to
distribute cocaine base, conspiracy to distribute cocaine base,
possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, and
distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-40563
-2-
and 846. The district court denied Adkism’s motion and granted a
certificate of appealability on the issue of whether Apprendi v.
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), should apply retroactively with
respect to an initial challenge to a conviction on collateral
review.
The issue is now foreclosed by this court’s decision in
United States v. Brown, 305 F.3d 304, 310 (5th Cir. 2002),
wherein this court held that Apprendi “is not retroactively
applicable to initial petitions under § 2255.” Accordingly, the
district court’s judgment denying Adkism’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255
motion is affirmed.
In light of the foregoing, Adkism’s motions for appointment
of counsel and oral argument are denied.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.