The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-40282•United States v. Henderson
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-40282
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRANDON HENDERSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 9:01-CR-12-ALL
--------------------
October 30, 2002
Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Attorney Frank W. Henderson appointed to represent Brandon
Henderson (“Henderson”) has requested leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Henderson has not responded to the motion. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 02-40282
-2-
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.