United States v. Martin

02-31116Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitApr 24, 2003

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 24, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-31116
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOHN HAROLD MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 94-CR-20071-1
--------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for
John Harold Martin, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed
a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Martin received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief and filed
a brief in opposition.
Our review of the briefs and of the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.