City of Shreveport v. Shreveport Canadian, et al

02-30785Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitMay 12, 2003

Full text

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
May 12, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 02-30785
CITY OF SHREVEPORT,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
VERSUS
SHREVEPORT CANADIAN FOOTBALL INC., BERNARD GLIEBERMAN,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Western District of Louisiana
97-CV-2353
Before DAVIS, JONES and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the
parties and argument of counsel, we are persuaded that the district
court did not err in concluding that Shreveport Pirates, Inc. (SPI)
was not a mandate or agent of Shreveport Canadian Football, Inc.
(Football). Because that is the only issue we left open for the
district court to consider on remand and because the district court

-- 1 of 2 --

2
did not err in reaching this conclusion, we affirm the judgment of
the district court.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.