Balliviero v. Konrad, et al

02-30222Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitJan 8, 2003

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-30222
Summary Calendar
LLOYD BALLIVIERO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GORDON K. KONRAD; LANA WERNER KONRAD;
SHAWN M. KONRAD; BELLE CHASSE MARINE
TRANSPORTATION, INC.,
Defendants-Appellants.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 01-CV-2014-K
--------------------
January 7, 2003
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gordon K. Konrad, Lana Werner Konrad, Shawn M. Konrad, and
Belle Chasse Marine Transportation, Inc., appeal the order
dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A) Lloyd
Balliviero’s action without prejudice due to misrepresentations
on his in forma pauperis affidavit. They argue that the
dismissal should have been with prejudice.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-30222
-2-
After a hearing, the district court determined that the
circumstances of Balliviero’s misrepresentations warranted a
dismissal without prejudice. The defendants have not shown that
the district court abused its discretion. See, e.g., Lay v.
Justices-Middle Dist. Court, 811 F.2d 285, 286 (5th Cir. 1987).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.