The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-30065•United States v. Randall
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-30065
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KENNETH RANDALL, Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 88-CR-261-D
--------------------
October 30, 2002
Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for
Kenneth Randall, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Randall has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he
has not filed a response.
Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.