Summary Calendar EDDIE DENNIS v. Stupp Corporation;

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-30063
Summary Calendar
EDDIE DENNIS
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
STUPP CORPORATION; ET AL,
Defendants
STUPP CORPORATION; UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA
Defendants - Appellees
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 01-CV-174-M3
--------------------
September 4, 2002
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Eddie Dennis appeals the summary-judgment dismissal of
hybrid § 301 Labor Management Relations Act action. We have
reviewed the record and the briefs on appeal and hold that Dennis
failed to show that a genuine issue of material fact existed with
regard to whether United Steelworkers of America (the Union)
breached its duty of fair representation by withdrawing a

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-30063
-2-
grievance filed on the behalf of Dennis. Celotex Corp. v.
Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324 (1986); FED. R. CIV. P. 56(e). Dennis
failed to show that the Union’s refusal to reconvene arbitration
and its withdrawal of the grievance were arbitrary or in bad
faith. Landry v. The Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co., 880 F.2d
846, 852 (5th Cir. 1989).
In the absence of a viable fair-representation claim, a
plaintiff cannot pursue a § 301 claim against the employer. Id.
at 851. Accordingly, the district court did not err in granting
summary judgment in favor of Stupp Corporation.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --