United States v. Carranza-Villegas

02-21166Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitJun 23, 2005

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
June 22, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-21166
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARCIAL CARRANZA-VILLEGAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:02-CR-87-ALL
--------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed for Marcial Carranza-Villegas (“Carranza”)
has filed a motion for leave to withdraw and a brief as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Carranza has
submitted two responses to counsel’s brief, moving in one to
proceed pro se on appeal and, in the other, for the appointment
of new counsel. Carranza’s motions are DENIED.
Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Carranza’s
responses, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-21166
-2-
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.