Stevens v. Goodyear Tire

02-21007Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitFeb 24, 2003

Full text

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 02-21007
Summary Calendar
ERIC L. STEVENS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, also
known as Goodyear Chemical,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division
H-01-CV-1371
February 21, 2003
Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
For essentially the reasons stated in the district court’s
careful memorandum and order of July 31, 2002, we agree that
Stevens’ summary judgment evidence failed to establish a prima
facie case that he was “disabled” within the meaning of the ADA.
The judgement of the district court is therefore

-- 1 of 2 --

2
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.