Full text
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 22, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-20870
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARTINE JIMENEZ, also known as Jose Guadalupe Ortiz,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-00-CR-245-3
- - - - - - - - - -
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Martine Jimenez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jimenez filed a
response. Our independent review of the briefs, the record, and
Jimenez’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities in the case, and
the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
