United States v. Gonzalez

02-20824Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitAug 22, 2003

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 22, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-20824
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RENE FLORES GONZALEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-01-CR-926-1
- - - - - - - - - -
Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Rene Flores Gonzalez on
appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzalez
has not filed a response. Our independent review of the briefs
and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities in the case, and
the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.