Youngblood v. Prudntl Ins Co Amer

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 15, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-20530
KATHERINE S. YOUNGBLOOD,
Individually and on behalf of
Youngblood and Associates, PLLC,
formerly known as Youngblood & White PLLC,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY
OF AMERICA; ET AL
Defendants,
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY
OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas
H-98-CV-1794
Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
We are persuaded that both subject matter jurisdiction in this
case and the appropriateness of the district court order imposing

-- 1 of 2 --

2
sanctions, including the amounts awarded, have been previously
upheld in a previous appeal. We will not revisit those decisions.
We are also persuaded that the awarded sanctions are enforceable as
a money judgment under Rule 69, FED. R. CIV. PROC. Finally, we find
no error in the district court order compelling discovery of
certain information relating to fees, given its protection of
privileged information.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --