The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-20498•United States v. Chaney
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-20498
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TERA YVETTE CHANEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-01-CR-199-ALL
--------------------
December 12, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Tera Yvette Chaney has filed a
motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Chaney has filed a
response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief,
and Chaney’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.