United States v. Trotty

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-10580
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VICTOR LAMONT TROTTY,
also known as Victor Lamont,
also known as Pinkie Trotty,
also known as Pinkie Lope,
also known as Pinky Trotty,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:01-CR-107-1-C
--------------------
February 20, 2003
Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor
Lamont Trotty has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Trotty has filed a response to counsel’s brief. Our
independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Trotty’s

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-10580
-2-
response shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --