The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-51069•Boulds v. Miles
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-51069
Conference Calendar
KENNETH W. BOULDS,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
R.D. MILES, Warden, FCI Bastrop,
Respondent-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. A:01-CV-566-JN
--------------------
April 11, 2002
Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Kenneth W. Boulds, federal prisoner # 66282-079, appeals the
district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition based on
its determination that Boulds had not demonstrated that relief
under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was inadequate or unavailable. On appeal,
Boulds renews the merits of the claims he raised in his petition.
He briefs no argument that his claims are proper under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 or that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief is unavailable to him.
By failing to brief such argument, Boulds has abandoned any
challenge to the reasons for the district court’s judgment and
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 01-51069
-2-
has thus waived the sole ground for appeal. See Yohey v.
Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); FED. R. APP. P.
28. The appeal is without arguable merit, is frivolous, and is
DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.
1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.