United States v. Thompson

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-51015
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRODERICK THOMPSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. A-00-CR-245-ALL
- - - - - - - - - -
August 13, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Broderick Thompson appeals his conviction for conspiracy,
health care fraud, theft from a health care program, false
statements relating to health care matters, money laundering
promotion, and money laundering greater than $10,000. He argues
that the district court erred in overruling his objection to the
constitution of the jury venire panel on the basis that African-
Americans were underrepresented. Thompson has failed to satisfy

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 01-51015
-2-
either the second or the third prong of the analysis set forth in
Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357, 363-70 (1979). He has failed to
demonstrate that the representation of African-Americans in
venires from which juries are selected is not fair and reasonable
in relation to the number of African-Americans in the community
and that this underrepresentation is due to systematic exclusion
of African-Americans in the jury-selection process. 439 U.S. at
364. We reject Thompson’s argument for adoption of the
comparative disparity analysis. See United States v. Maskeny,
609 F.2d 183, 190 (5th Cir. 1980); see also, United States v.
Weaver, 267 F.3d 231, 241-48 (3d Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S.
Ct. 1118 (2002).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --