United States v. Orosco-Gonzalez

01-50210Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitOct 30, 2001

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-50210
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HUMBERTO OROSCO-GONZALEZ, also known as Matias
Gonzalez-Macias,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-00-CR-1620-DB
- - - - - - - - - -
October 29, 2001
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Humberto
Orosco-Gonzalez has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Orosco-Gonzalez has responded to the motion by requesting
appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of the
brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities, defendant’s motion for

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 01-50210
-2-
appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED, and the appeal is
DISMISSED.
MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL
DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.