United States v. Everfield

01-41431Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitAug 2, 2002

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41431
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SOLOMON EVERFIELD, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:01-CR-109-ALL
- - - - - - - - - -
August 2, 2002
Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Solomon
Everfield, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Everfield was notified of counsel’s motion, but has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 01-41431
-2-
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.