United States v. Regino

01-41083Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitMay 30, 2002

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41083
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JESUS REGINO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-01-CR-73-1
--------------------
May 29, 2002
Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Regino has moved
to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Regino has filed a response.
Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and
Regino’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,
counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Regino’s motion for the appointment of
counsel is DENIED.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.