The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-41016•United States v. Baeza-Sanchez
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41016
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GONZALO BAEZA-SANCHEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. L-01-CR-504-ALL
--------------------
June 19, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gonzalo Baeza-Sanchez appeals from his guilty-plea
conviction for illegally reentering the United States after
having been deported subsequent to an aggravated felony
conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that his
indictment violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments because it
does not allege general intent.
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 01-41016
-2-
As Baeza-Sanchez concedes, however, his argument is
foreclosed by Fifth Circuit precedent. See United States v.
Guzman-Ocampo, 236 F.3d 233, 237-39 (5th Cir. 2000), cert.
denied, 533 U.S. 953 (2001); see also United States v. Berrios-
Centeno, 250 F.3d 294, 297-300 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 122
S. Ct. 288 (2001). He raises the argument only to preserve it
for Supreme Court review.
The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.