Jackson v. Exxon Company USA

01-31130Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitMar 19, 2002

Full text

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
______________________________
No. 01-31130
Summary Calendar
______________________________
BARBARA M. JACKSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant
VERSUS
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee
___________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Middle District of Louisiana
(99-CV-864-D)
___________________________________________________
March 18, 2002
Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Barbara M. Jackson, a current ExxonMobil employee who has
worked in an administrative/clerical role for the company since
1980, asserts racial discrimination and retaliation claims against
ExxonMobil for violations of Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Ms.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Jackson complains of approximately 33 separate employment actions.
Her complaints can be generally categorized as claims for (i) job
erosion; (ii) elimination of overtime; (iii) attendance,
performance, and miscellaneous issues; and (iv) failure to transfer
or promote her to other jobs on numerous occasions.
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of
ExxonMobil on all Jackson’s claims. Ms. Jackson appealed the
district court’s rulings.
After considering the record excerpts and briefs, we hereby
AFFIRM for the reasons stated by the district court in its summary
judgment orders of May 16 and August 21, 2001.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.