The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-31040•United States v. Williams
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-31040
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TREVOR WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 98-CR-207-12-N
--------------------
April 11, 2002
Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Trevor Williams appeals the sentence following his
conviction for solicitation to commit murder and using and
carrying a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime.
Williams argues that the district court erred in imposing a
$20,000 fine because he is indigent and will likely remain
indigent upon his release from prison.
Because Williams waived the right to appeal his sentence,
including the $20,000 fine imposed by the district court, his
sentence is affirmed. See United States v. Robinson, 187 F.3d
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 01-31040
-2-
516, 517 (5th Cir. 1999). Even if Williams did not waive the
right to appeal his sentence, the district court’s imposition of
the fine was not erroneous. See United States v. Martinez, 151
F.3d 384, 395-96 (5th Cir. 1998).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.